Equation
LGV = I. Change the edges and you change LG, so the voltage and current pattern changes even when the injected current is unchanged.
Change a circuit graph, a cavity boundary, or a quantum coupling network. The systems are physically different, but the same structural lesson appears: changing geometry or connectivity changes the operator—and therefore changes the allowed response.
LGV = I. Change the edges and you change LG, so the voltage and current pattern changes even when the injected current is unchanged.
A ring offers alternate paths; a chain does not. The equivalent resistance and spectral gap make part of that structural difference measurable.
Keep node count and conductance fixed. Switch only the topology. If the response changes, geometry—not the source amplitude—caused the change.
Changing a or b shifts the allowed eigenfrequencies because the field must still satisfy the cavity boundary conditions.
In a square cavity, modes such as (1,2) and (2,1) share the same idealized frequency. Stretching one dimension breaks that symmetry.
This is a scalar rectangular-cavity teaching model. Real electromagnetic cavities require the full vector Maxwell problem, materials, losses and three-dimensional geometry.
H = Σ εᵢ|i⟩⟨i| − JΣ⟨ij⟩(|i⟩⟨j|+|j⟩⟨i|). Connectivity determines which sites exchange amplitude.
Increase the onsite defect and one or more eigenmodes can concentrate near that site. The graph did not move in physical space; the energy landscape changed.
Here the structure-dependent operator is H rather than a circuit Laplacian or Maxwell operator. Similar mathematics does not erase the physical distinctions.
That is the common idea worth carrying between domains. The circuit uses a graph Laplacian, the cavity uses a boundary-value eigenproblem, and the quantum network uses a Hamiltonian. Each system keeps its own physics.